Comparison of the Clinical Outcomes Between Early and Delayed Transplantation After SARS-CoV-2 Infection.

Our study analyzed 95 solid organ transplant (SOT) and 78 hematopoietic stem cell transplant (HSCT) recipients with prior coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19). Patients who underwent transplantation within 30 days of COVID-19 infection comprised the early group, and those who underwent transplantation post-30 days of COVID-19 infection comprised the delayed group. In the early transplantation group, no patient, whether undergoing SOT and HSCT, experienced COVID-19-associated complications. In the delayed transplantation group, one patient each from SOT and HSCT experienced COVID-19-associated complications. Additionally, among early SOT and HSCT recipients, two and six patients underwent transplantation within seven days of COVID-19 diagnosis, respectively. However, no significant differences were observed in the clinical outcomes of these patients compared to those in other patients. Early transplantation following severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 infection can be performed without increased risk of COVID-19-associated complications. Therefore, transplantation needs not be delayed by COVID-19 infection.

The origin of sequence type 72 community-associated methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA) and fusidic acid (FA) resistant sequence type 5 MRSA: Analysis of FA resistance and spa type in a single center in South Korea.

INTRODUCTION: We investigated the prevalence of fusidic acid (FA) resistance in MSSA and MRSA stratified by sequence (ST) and spa types, and determined the prevalence of FA resistance mechanisms. METHODS: From August 2014 to April 2020, S. aureus blood isolates were collected in Asan Medical Center, Seoul, South Korea. Antimicrobial susceptibility tests were performed using broth microdilution and interpreted according to EUCAST's FA criteria. We performed spa typing for fusA mutation presence and acquired FA resistance determinants (fusB, fusC, and fusD) by PCR. RESULTS: Of the 590 MRSA isolates, 372 were FA resistant, and among 425 MSSA isolates, 136 were resistant. Of the 380 ST5-MRSA isolates, 350 were FA resistant, whereas only 1 of 14 ST5-MSSA isolates was FA resistant. Conversely, of the 163 ST72-MRSA isolates, only 8 were resistant, whereas 37 of 42 ST72-MSSA were resistant. The fusA mutation (80%) was the most common determinant. The one FA resistant ST5-MSSA isolate belonged to the t2460 spa type, the most common spa type (24 of 35 isolates) of FA resistant ST5-MRSA. In addition, t324 and t148, which are minor spa types of ST72-MSSA, were susceptible to FA, in contrast to other ST72-MSSA spa types, and the major spa type of ST72-MRSA (110 of 163 isolates). CONCLUSIONS: FA resistance was common in ST5-MRSA and ST72-MSSA, and rare in ST5-MSSA and ST72-MRSA. Our findings suggest that minor clones of ST5-MSSA isolates, with the fusA mutation and minor clones of ST72-MSSA susceptible to FA, may have evolved to harbor the mecA gene.

Clinical safety of remdesivir therapy in COVID-19 patients with renal insufficiency.

Though remdesivir benefits COVID-19 patients, its use in those with renal dysfunction is currently limited due to concerns about possible toxic effects of accumulated sulfobutylether-ß-cyclodextrin (SBECD) on liver and kidney. We examined renal and hepatic function for a month in renally-impaired COVID-19 patients who were treated or not treated with remdesivir to assess the safety of the drug. A retrospective study was performed in adult COVID-19 patients with glomerular filtration rates of <30 ml/min/1.73 m2 at admission to a tertiary care hospital between November 2020 and March 2022. Data on serum creatinine and liver chemistry were collected serially. A total of 101 patients with impaired renal function were analyzed, comprising 64 remdesivir-treated patients and 37 who did not receive any antiviral agent. Although remdesivir-treated patients were more likely to be infected with the Omicron variant (79.7% vs. 48.6%), baseline characteristics did not differ significantly between the two groups. Among patients who initially did not require dialysis, 18.4% (7/38) of remdesivir-treated patients developed acute kidney injury (AKI) at days 4-6, compared with 51.7% (15/29) of non-remdesivir-treated patients. Liver injury severity worsened in 3.1% (2/64) of remdesivir-treated patients and 5.4% (2/37) of non-remdesivir-treated patients at days 4-6. In addition, there was no significant increase in AKI and liver injury over time in remdesivir-treated patients, and there were no cases of discontinuation of remdesivir due to adverse reactions. Concerns regarding the safety of SBECD should not lead to hasty withholding of remdesivir treatment in renally-impaired COVID-19 patients.

The association between antibody responses and prolonged viable SARS-CoV-2 shedding in immunocompromised patients: a prospective cohort study.

Immunocompromised COVID-19 patients were prospectively enrolled from March to November 2022 to understand the association between antibody responses and SARS-CoV-2 shedding. A total of 62 patients were analyzed and the results indicated a faster decline in genomic and subgenomic viral RNA in patients with higher neutralizing and S1-specific IgG antibodies (both P < 0.001). Notably, high neutralizing antibody levels were associated with a significantly faster decrease in viable virus cultures (P = 0.04). Our observations suggest the role of neutralizing antibodies in prolonged virus shedding in immunocompromised patients, highlighting the potential benefits of enhancing their humoral immune response through vaccination or monoclonal antibody treatments.

Tracking antigen-specific TCR clonotypes in SARS-CoV-2 infection reveals distinct severity trajectories.

Despite the importance of antigen-specific T cells in infectious disease, characterizing and tracking clonally amplified T cells during the progression of a patient's symptoms remain unclear. Here, we performed a longitudinal, in-depth single-cell multiomics analysis of samples from asymptomatic, mild, usual severe, and delayed severe patients of SARS-CoV-2 infection. Our in-depth analysis revealed that hyperactive or improper T-cell responses were more aggressive in delayed severe patients. Interestingly, tracking of antigen-specific T-cell receptor (TCR) clonotypes along the developmental trajectory indicated an attenuation in functional T cells upon severity. In addition, increased glycolysis and interleukin-6 signaling in the cytotoxic T cells were markedly distinct in delayed severe patients compared to usual severe patients, particularly in the middle and late stages of infection. Tracking B-cell receptor clonotypes also revealed distinct transitions and somatic hypermutations within B cells across different levels of disease severity. Our results suggest that single-cell TCR clonotype tracking can distinguish the severity of patients through immunological hallmarks, leading to a better understanding of the severity differences in and improving the management of infectious diseases by analyzing the dynamics of immune responses over time.

Virological characteristics and the rapid antigen test as deisolation criteria in immunocompromised patients with COVID-19: A prospective cohort study.

There are limited data supporting current Centers for Disease Control and Prevention guidelines for the isolation period in moderate to severely immunocompromised patients with coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19). Adult COVID-19 patients who underwent solid organ transplantation (SOT) or received active chemotherapy against hematologic malignancy were enrolled and weekly respiratory samples were collected. Samples with positive genomic real-time polymerase chain reaction results underwent virus culture and rapid antigen testing (RAT). A total of 65 patients (40 with hematologic malignancy and 25 SOT) were enrolled. The median duration of viable virus shedding was 4 weeks (interquartile range: 3-7). Multivariable analysis revealed that B-cell depletion (hazard ratio [HR]: 4.76) was associated with prolonged viral shedding, and COVID-19 vaccination (≥3 doses) was negatively associated with prolonged viral shedding (HR: 0.22). The sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value, and negative predictive value of RAT for viable virus shedding were 79%, 76%, 74%, and 81%, respectively. The negative predictive value of RAT was only 48% (95% confidence interval [CI]: 33-65) in the samples from those with symptom onset ≤20 days, but it was as high as 92% (95% CI: 85-96) in the samples from those with symptom onset >20 days. About half of immunocompromised COVID-19 patients shed viable virus for ≥4 weeks from the diagnosis, and virus shedding was prolonged especially in unvaccinated patients with B-cell-depleting therapy treatment. RAT beyond 20 days in immunocompromised patients had a relatively high negative predictive value for viable virus shedding.

Molecular Characteristics and Prevalence of Rifampin Resistance in Staphylococcus aureus Isolates from Patients with Bacteremia in South Korea.

Rifampin resistance (RIF-R) in Staphylococcus aureus (S. aureus) with rpoB mutations as one of its resistance mechanisms has raised concern about clinical treatment and infection prevention strategies. Data on the prevalence and molecular epidemiology of RIF-R S. aureus blood isolates in South Korea are scarce. We used broth microdilution to investigate RIF-R prevalence and analyzed the rpoB gene mutation in 1615 S. aureus blood isolates (772 methicillin-susceptible and 843 methicillin-resistant S. aureus (MRSA)) from patients with bacteremia, between 2008 and 2017. RIF-R prevalence and antimicrobial susceptibility were determined. Multilocus sequence typing was used to characterize the isolate's molecular epidemiology; Staphylococcus protein A (spa), staphylococcal cassette chromosome mec (SCCmec), and rpoB gene mutations were detected by PCR. Among 52 RIF-R MRSA isolates out of 57 RIF-R S. aureus blood isolates (57/1615, 0.4%; 5 methicillin-susceptible and 52 MRSA), ST5 (44/52, 84.6%), SCCmec IIb (40/52, 76.9%), and spa t2460 (27/52, 51.9%) were predominant. rpoB gene mutations with amino acid substitutions showed that A477D (17/48, 35.4%) frequently conferred high-level RIF resistance (MIC > 128 mg/L), followed by H481Y (4/48, 8.3%). RIF-R S. aureus blood isolates in South Korea have unique molecular characteristics and are closely associated with rpoB gene mutations. RIF-R surveillance through S. aureus-blood isolate epidemiology could enable effective therapeutic management.

Clinical impact of metformin exposure during Staphylococcus aureus bacteremia in patients with diabetes mellitus.

PURPOSE: Increasing evidence has suggested that metformin may play positive roles in a wide range of infectious diseases. This study aimed to investigate the clinical impact of metformin exposure during Staphylococcus aureus bacteremia (SAB) in patients with diabetes. METHODS: A 3-year observational cohort study of 452 patients (aged ≥ 16 years) with SAB was performed at a tertiary care hospital. Metformin exposure was defined as receiving metformin during SAB, regardless of metformin use before the onset of bacteremia. RESULTS: Of 452 patients, 51 (11.3%) were classified in Group A (diabetes with metformin exposure), 115 (25.4%) in Group B (diabetes without metformin exposure), and 286 (63.3%) in Group C (no diabetes). The 30-day mortality rate in Group A was significantly lower than that in Group B (3.9% [2/51] versus 14.8% [17/115]; p = 0.04) and lower than that in Group C (3.9% [2/51] versus 17.1% [49/286]; p = 0.02). The mortality rates did not differ between Group B and Group C (14.8% [17/115] versus 17.1% [49/286]; p = 0.57). The rates of persistent and recurrent bacteremia were comparable among the three groups. Multivariate analysis indicated that metformin exposure was significantly associated with reduced mortality (adjusted odds ratio, 0.20; 95% confidence interval, 0.04-0.88; p = 0.03). CONCLUSIONS: Metformin exposure during SAB appears to be an independent predictor of survival in patients with diabetes.

Routine ophthalmologic examination in Klebsiella pneumoniae bacteremia is not necessary: incidence of and risk factors for ocular involvement.

Klebsiella pneumoniae bacteremia is known to present a virulent clinical course, including multiple metastatic infections, which is not uncommon in Asia. However, there are limited data on the incidence and risk factors for ocular involvement in K. pneumoniae bacteremia. We retrospectively reviewed the medical records of all patients with K. pneumoniae bacteremia who underwent ophthalmologic examination in a tertiary center in Seoul, Korea, from February 2012 to December 2020. Two retinal specialists reviewed the findings of the ophthalmologic examinations and classified them as endophthalmitis, chorioretinitis, and no ocular involvement. Of 689 patients, 56 [8.1%; 95% confidence interval (CI) 6.2-10.4] had ocular involvement, and 9 (1.3%; 95% CI 0.6-2.5) were diagnosed with endophthalmitis. Of 47 patients with chorioretinitis, 45 (95.7%) improved with systemic antibiotic therapy alone. Community-onset bacteremia (100% vs 62.1% vs 57.4%, P = 0.04), cryptogenic liver abscess (55.6% vs 11.8% vs 8.5%, P = 0.003), and metastatic infection (66.7% vs 5.8% vs 10.6%, P < 0.001) were more common in endophthalmitis than in no ocular involvement or chorioretinitis. In the multivariable analysis, cryptogenic liver abscess [adjusted odds ratio (aOR), 6.63; 95% CI 1.44-35.20] and metastatic infection (aOR, 17.52; 95% CI 3.69-96.93) were independent risk factors for endophthalmitis. Endophthalmitis was not associated with 30-day mortality. Endophthalmitis is rare in Asian patients with K. pneumoniae bacteremia. Targeted ophthalmologic examination in those with cryptogenic liver abscess, metastatic infection, or ocular symptoms may be more appropriate than routine examination of all patients.

False positive Aspergillus galactomannan assay results caused by specific parenteral nutrition.

In September 2022, the proportion of clinically false positive results with high index values for the galactomannan (GM) assay increased dramatically in our hospital and remained high until November 2022. We aimed to identify the possible causative agent that led to the dramatic increase in false positivity in GM assay. A case-control-control study was conducted, and patients admitted to two intensive care units between September and November 2022 were included. We defined each time point at which the GM assay was conducted in a patient as an episode and classified episodes into strong-positive (≥10.0 index; case), positive (control), and negative (<0.5 index; control) groups. We compared the medications administered in three groups and measured GM levels in relevant medications, including parenteral nutrition (PN). In total, 118 episodes in 33 patients were classified into three groups. There were 46 negative, 23 positive, and 49 strong-positive episodes, and there was a significant difference in the use of Winuf® PNs (P < .001) between the three groups. Forty episodes (82%) in the strong-positive group received Winuf®, compared with three (6.5%) in the negative group and one (4.3%) in the positive group (P < .001). All samples of Winuf® PNs used in the five patients whose GM results were repeatedly strong-positive were strongly positive for GM. False positivity in GM assay can be caused by the administration of specific PNs. A thorough investigation of prescribed medications should be considered when there is an abrupt increase in the proportion of strong-positive or positive GM results.

Clinical characteristics of COVID-19 rebound after nirmatrelvir-ritonavir or molnupiravir therapy: A prospective cohort study.

The clinical characteristics of the rebound phenomenon after antiviral therapy in patients with Coronavirus disease-2019 (COVID-19) are largely unknown. There are few data comparing the rebound phenomenon after molnupiravir therapy to that after nirmatrelvir-ritonavir therapy. We investigated the incidence and risk factors associated with COVID-19 rebound after nirmatrelvir-ritonavir or molnupiravir therapy during the Omicron era. This prospective cohort study enrolled patients with mild-to-moderate COVID-19 who received nirmatrelvir-ritonavir or molnupiravir. We conducted weekly questionnaires of symptom scores from day 0 to day 28, with an additional day when patients experienced reappearing symptoms. We defined COVID-19 rebound as when patients experienced a 50% increase in symptom scores compared to the lowest symptom score between days 0 and 14. Among the 150 patients, 93 (62%) and 57 (38%) received nirmatrelvir-ritonavir therapy and molnupiravir, respectively. Of these, 11 patients (7.3%; 95% CI, 3.1-11.5) experienced COVID-19 rebound. The median duration from antiviral therapy to rebound was 12 days. Patients with clinical rebound had a higher symptom score at antiviral therapy initiation than those without (median, 5 vs 4; P = .02). There was no significant difference in the clinical rebounds associated with nirmatrelvir-ritonavir and molnupiravir therapy (5.4% vs 10.5%; P = .39). Approximately one-tenth of patients with mild-to-moderate COVID-19 who received antiviral therapy experienced rebound phenomena after treatment. Regardless of antiviral therapy type, high initial symptom scores were associated with a more frequent rebound phenomenon.

Clinical Characteristics of and Risk Factors for Subsequent Carbapenemase-producing Enterobacterales (CPE) Bacteraemia in Rectal CPE Carriers.

BACKGROUND: Due to high mortality and limited treatment options, the rise in carbapenemase-producing Enterobacterales (CPE) has become a major concern. This study aimed to evaluate the incidence and characteristics of subsequent CPE bacteraemia in rectal CPE carriers and investigate the risk factors for CPE bacteraemia compared with non-carbapenemase-producing (non-CP) Enterobacterales bacteraemia. METHODS: A retrospective analysis was conducted on adult patients who were confirmed to have CPE colonisation by stool surveillance culture at a tertiary hospital from January 2018 to February 2022. All episodes of Enterobacterales bacteraemia up to 6 months after CPE colonisation were identified. RESULTS: Of 1174 patients identified as rectal CPE carriers, 69 (5.8%; 95% CI 4.6-7.3%) experienced subsequent CPE bacteraemia during the 6 months after the diagnosis of CPE colonisation. Colonisation by a Klebsiella pneumoniae carbapenemase (KPC) producer (or CP-K. pneumoniae), colonisation by multiple CPE species, chronic kidney disease and haematological malignancy were independently associated with CPE bacteraemia in CPE carriers. When CPE carriers developed Enterobacterales bacteraemia, the causative agent was more frequently non-CP Enterobacterales than CPE (63.6% vs. 36.4%). Among these patients, colonisation with a KPC producer, CPE colonisation at multiple sites, shorter duration from colonisation to bacteraemia (< 30 days) and recent intraabdominal surgery were independent risk factors for CPE bacteraemia rather than non-CP Enterobacterales bacteraemia. CONCLUSIONS: In CPE carriers, non-CP Enterobacterales were more often responsible for bacteraemia than CPE. Empirical antibiotic therapy for CPE should be considered when sepsis is suspected in a CPE carrier with risk factors for CPE bacteraemia.

Impact of routine brain imaging on the prognosis of patients with left-sided valve infective endocarditis without neurological manifestations.

BACKGROUND: There are limited data on the impact of routine use of brain magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) on the prognosis of neurologically asymptomatic patients with left-sided infective endocarditis (IE). METHODS: Among patients diagnosed with possible or definite IE in two tertiary referral centers between January 2005 and March 2019, we identified 527 left-sided IE patients without neurological symptoms or signs at the time of diagnosis. Patients who underwent brain MRI within 1 week after the IE diagnosis were classified as the routine brain imaging group (n = 216), and the rest were categorized as the control group (n = 311). All-cause mortality at 3 months, attributable mortality (defined as death directly related to IE), and fatal neurological events compared after adjustment using inverse probability of treatment weighting (IPTW). RESULTS: During a median follow-up of 57 months, the routine brain imaging group had a similar risk of 3-month all-cause mortality to the control group in the multivariate analysis (hazard ratio [HR], 0.53; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.24-1.14) and IPTW-adjusted cohort (HR, 0.59; 95% CI, 0.25-1.42). The risks of attributable mortality and fatal neurological events were also similar between the two groups in the multivariable analysis and IPTW-adjusted cohort. In the subgroup analysis, the routine brain imaging group showed more favorable outcomes in cases of large vegetation (> 10 mm) or acute-onset microorganisms. CONCLUSIONS: Routine use of brain MRI in left-sided IE patients without neurological manifestations is not associated with improved clinical outcomes. However, routine brain imaging in appropriate clinical settings could improve clinical outcomes.

Protracted course of SARS-CoV-2 pneumonia in moderately to severely immunocompromised patients.

There have been few studies comparing the clinical characteristics and outcomes of SARS-CoV-2 pneumonia in individuals with and without moderately to severely immunocompromised conditions. We reviewed adult patients with SARS-CoV-2 infection who had radiologic evidence of pneumonia at a tertiary hospital in Seoul, South Korea, from February 2020 to April 2022. Moderately to severely immunocompromised status was defined as medical conditions or treatments that resulted in increased risk of severe COVID-19 and weakened immune response to COVID-19 vaccine as recommended by Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. The time to pneumonia development was defined as the time from symptom onset to the time when radiologic evidence of pneumonia was obtained. Viral clearance was defined as a Ct value > 30. COVID-19-related death was defined as 90-day death following imaging-confirmed pneumonia without any other plausible cause of death. A total of 467 patients with SARS-CoV-2 pneumonia were analyzed. Of these, 102 (22%) were moderately to severely immunocompromised. The median (IQR) time to pneumonia development was significantly longer in moderately to severely immunocompromised patients (9.5 [6-14] days) than the comparator (6 [3-8] days), p < 0.001), as was the median time to viral clearance (21 versus 12 days, p < 0.001). Moderately to severely immunocompromised status (aOR, 18.39; 95% CI, 5.80-58.30; p < 0.001) was independently associated with COVID-19-related death. Patients with moderately to severely immunocompromised conditions are likely to experience a more protracted course of SARS-CoV-2 pneumonia and a worse outcome than those without these conditions.

Bacterial Co-Infection and Empirical Antibacterial Therapy in Patients With COVID-19.

BACKGROUND: The rate and composition of bacterial co-infection in patients with coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) were evaluated when microbiological testing was conducted on the majority of patients. We also evaluated whether the use of empirical antibacterials was associated with mortality. METHODS: In this retrospective study, all of the adult patients with COVID-19 hospitalized in a single tertiary hospital in South Korea between February 2020 and December 2021 were included. Bacterial co-infection was assessed by sputum cultures, blood cultures, and molecular testing, including polymerase chain reaction sputum testing and urinary antigen tests. Mortality was compared between patients who received empirical antibacterials and those who did not. RESULTS: Of the 367 adult patients admitted during the study period, 300 (81.7%) had sputum culture results and were included in the analysis. Of these 300 patients, 127 (42.3%) had a history of antibiotic exposure. The co-infection rate within 48 hours was 8.3% (25/300): 6.4% (11/173) of patients without prior antibiotic exposure and 11% (14/127) of patients with prior antibacterial exposure. The co-infected bacteria were different according to antibacterial exposure before admission, and multi-drug resistant pathogens were detected exclusively in the antibacterial exposed group. Among the patients without positive results for the microbiological tests, empirical antibacterials were used in 33.3% of cases (100/300). Empirical antibacterial therapy was not significantly related to the 30-day mortality or in-hospital mortality rates in the study cohort before or after the propensity score-matching. CONCLUSION: In this study including only patients underwent microbiological testing, bacterial co-infection was not frequent, and the co-infected organisms varied depending on previous antibacterial exposures. Given the rarity of co-infection and the lack of potential benefits, empiric antibacterial use in COVID-19 should be an important target of antibiotic stewardship.